Share

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Brazil’s Example – Breaking an Addiction

The U.S. dependence on imported oil and “too little too late” energy policy has left us vulnerable to future oil shocks. Even the President has said “we have an oil addiction.” We give billions of dollars away each year, much of it to countries which are not shining examples of democracy, from Venezuela to Saudi Arabia.

But Brazil is an example how to break that addiction. They don’t import any oil. How? By running cars using 100% ethanol produced from sugar cane.

So why don’t we do the same? We are taking tiny baby steps when we need giant leaps forward in alternative energy. Time is not on our side. India and China are growing rapidly and consuming what used to be surplus oil stocks. We have the capacity to grow our own fuel. American farmers have the ability to produce the feedstock – from corn to sugar cane and even the President’s straw grass.

Congress could, and should, require manufacturers to build what Brazil calls “flex cars” – cars that will run on gas, 100% ethanol or both.

So what are we waiting for? As JFK once said: “The time to repair the roof is when the sun is shining.” The time generate alternative energy supplies is NOW, before the rain starts falling on our heads –and our SUV’s sit stalled on the side of the road during the next shortage.

2 comments:

Global American said...

MoCity: You act like I'm a contender in the race to replace our Congressman. Obviously I am not. LOL.

FYI - I did not say Elam was a "disgrace to the party." I did use the term "weasel" which I apologize for using when I was really mad at Eric for dropping me at the last minute. Chris is a nice kid and Thode is now history -- so do u see me wasting time talking about him? No. Time to get a life guy and move on. This "find a replacement" has turned into a bad joke -- and makes it more likely a Democrat will take the seat. At least he was picked by voters instead of a smoke filled room...

Global American said...

P.S. The Constitution does require a SPECIAL ELECTION to replace House members - not a few people in a smoky room or a few people who don't smoke at all.

I thought CONSERVATIVES believed in STRICT CONSTRUCTION of the Constitution?

Apparently not when it doesn't guarantee the desire result? What a "great" example for the Iraqis...